Performance improvement plan generator
Create an HR-safe, evidence-based PIP from the record you already captured — grounded in the documented 1:1 history, not in a stressful blank template the night before the conversation.
A performance improvement plan is one of the highest-stakes documents a manager writes. Done badly — vague, backfilled from memory, or skewed toward last month — it's unfair to the person and exposes the organization. Done well, it's specific, grounded in the documented record, and focused squarely on performance and behavior. Performle's PIP generator is built for the second kind. It drafts the plan from evidence you captured over time, so the gaps it names are the ones you can point to, and it treats the output as a starting point you and HR review — never the decision itself.
It builds from the record you already captured
Through the period, after each 1:1, you capture a short note and Performle proposes the wins, the dated commitments, the goals, and the topics raised — and you approve what's real. That same captured history is what the PIP generator draws on. Pick a person, choose the review writer's "PIP" type, and it drafts a structured plan: where expectations weren't met, what specifically the record shows, and what measurable improvement looks like over a defined window — all traced back to documented evidence rather than a general impression.
Alongside it, the Candid Verdict gives an evidence-based recommendation drawn from the same record. Together they produce a performance-improvement plan that's grounded in the documented history — the difference between "things haven't been working out" and a plan that cites the commitments missed and the conversations already had.
Why the documented record matters
The strongest PIP is one where nothing in it is a surprise. If a concern was raised in a 1:1 in March, captured, and approved, then naming it in a plan in September is fair and defensible. If it only exists in your memory, it isn't. Drafting from the captured record means the plan reflects a pattern you can show — dated, specific, and consistent with what the person has already heard — instead of a case assembled under deadline pressure. That's also what removes recency bias: the plan rests on the whole period, not the latest incident.
You stay the author
Nothing is auto-applied. The generated PIP is editable and exportable — adjust the framing, the milestones, and the timeline; add context only you have; remove anything that doesn't belong. You review it, HR reviews it, and only then does it become a document you act on. The AI handles assembling the evidence into a clear first draft; the responsibility and the decision stay with you.
How it works
Document the 1:1s
Capture short 1:1 notes through the period. AI proposes the wins, commitments, and concerns — you approve what's real.
AI drafts the PIP
Pick a person and the "PIP" type; the generator builds an evidence-based plan, and the Candid Verdict adds a recommendation.
Edit, then sign off
Edit every word, run it past HR, and finalize. Decision-support — nothing is auto-applied or actioned for you.
A fair improvement plan never contains a surprise. If it needed saying, it was said — and captured — long before it reached the page.
Draft an evidence-based PIP from your record
Build a performance improvement plan grounded in the 1:1 history you already captured — HR-safe, specific, and yours to edit. The PIP writer is included in every plan, and every plan starts with a 14-day free trial.
Start your 14-day free trial → Or try the live demo →